• author: WordsAtScale

Comparing GBD4 Inside of ChatGPT and OpenAI Playground


In recent news, it was announced that GBD4 is now available to the general public, not just limited to Beauty Plus members. This means that users of both ChatGPT and OpenAI can now access the benefits of GBD4. In this article, we will compare the two platforms, highlighting their pros, cons, and general features.


  • GBD4 inside of ChatGPT: $20 USD per month
  • OpenAI Playground: Ongoing payments with hard caps on usage (currently 25 messages every three hours)

It is difficult to compare pricing directly, but considering the potential number of articles one can write per day, ChatGPT may end up being more cost-effective for the average user.

User Experience (UX) and User Interface (UI)

  • ChatGPT:
    • UX and UI are user-friendly and easy to navigate.
  • OpenAI Playground:
    • Has a more complex interface with various settings such as temperature, frequency penalty, and presence penalty.

In terms of UX and UI, ChatGPT appears to be easier to use and understand for the average consumer. The simplicity of ChatGPT's design allows for a more seamless user experience, earning it a higher rating in this category compared to OpenAI Playground.


  • ChatGPT:
    • Current limit is 25 messages every three hours, which can be cumbersome for those writing articles at scale.
  • OpenAI Playground:
    • No hard limit like ChatGPT, but usage needs to be monitored to avoid excessive costs.

When it comes to limits, OpenAI Playground has an advantage over ChatGPT due to the absence of hard caps. However, the potential costs can add up quickly without proper caution. In this category, ChatGPT scores lower due to its limitations.

Learning Curve

  • ChatGPT:
    • Relatively straightforward with conversational prompts.
  • OpenAI Playground:
    • Requires knowledge of settings like temperature, frequency penalty, and presence penalty.

Learning to use ChatGPT is easier for the average user compared to OpenAI Playground. The conversational nature of ChatGPT simplifies the process, resulting in a lower learning curve. OpenAI Playground, on the other hand, has more settings to understand, making it slightly more challenging for users.


  • ChatGPT:
    • Offers a wide variety of plugins, including code interpreters, SEO plugins, image plugins, and more.
  • OpenAI Playground:
    • Does not support plugins.

ChatGPT's plugin store provides users with a range of options to enhance their writing experience. While OpenAI Playground lacks plugin support, users can partially compensate for this limitation through alternative methods. In this category, ChatGPT receives a higher score due to its extensive plugin offerings.

Internet Access

  • ChatGPT:
    • Allows access to the internet through plugins like web pilots and Vox scripts.
  • OpenAI Playground:
    • Does not have direct internet access, requiring users to gather information externally.

ChatGPT's ability to connect to the internet through plugins allows users to maintain factual accuracy in their writing. Although OpenAI Playground doesn't provide direct internet access, users can still overcome this limitation using external plugins. ChatGPT earns a higher rating in this category due to its ability to integrate internet data within the system.


  • ChatGPT:
    • Personal observations suggest a lower quality response compared to OpenAI Playground.
  • OpenAI Playground:
    • Personal observations suggest higher quality responses.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that OpenAI Playground often provides higher quality responses compared to ChatGPT. However, further research is needed to validate this claim. Based on personal observations, ChatGPT receives a lower score in this category compared to OpenAI Playground.

System Sidebar

ChatGPT provides a system sidebar that allows users to interlink content, feature YouTube transcripts, and utilize various plugins. This feature significantly enhances the writing experience and aids in performing tasks within the platform itself. OpenAI Playground lacks a similar feature, making it less convenient for users. The system sidebar in ChatGPT is highly valuable and contributes to a productive writing experience, earning it a higher rating in this aspect compared to OpenAI Playground.

Additional Considerations

It is important to note that the ratings given in this article are subjective and reflect the author's personal opinion. It is recommended for users to consider their specific needs and preferences when selecting between ChatGPT and OpenAI Playground.

+Conclusion and final remarks...

Open Playground vs. ChatGPT: A Comparative Analysis


In this article, we will compare two popular AI-powered writing platforms, Open Playground and ChatGPT (ChadGPD), exploring their strengths and weaknesses. Our analysis aims to help users make an informed decision about which platform best suits their needs.

The System Sidebar

One notable difference between Open Playground and ChatGPT lies in the availability and functionality of the system sidebar. Open Playground boasts a robust system sidebar, which allows users to replicate information, reference debuff information, and more. This feature provides convenience and enhances the overall user experience. In contrast, ChatGPT's limited system sidebar can be considered a weakness, as it lacks the same level of functionality and convenience.

Use Cases

Internal Linking

Open Playground excels in the realm of internal linking. Users can conveniently feed internal links and effortlessly build beautiful prompts that reference these links. However, ChatGPT falls short in this aspect, as its internal linking functionality is not as effective and efficient.

AI Detection Bypass

An area where Open Playground outshines ChatGPT is in the ability to avoid AI detection. Open Playground offers a hybrid approach that allows users to leverage different settings, such as temperature, frequency penalty, and presence balancing, to bypass AI detection consistently. This provides users with a reliable and effective way to bypass originality.AI. Unfortunately, replicating this capability within ChatGPT is currently not possible. While alternatives like anti-jackable.AI or agility riser offer AI anti-detection mechanisms, Open Playground's approach stands out as a more dependable option.

Plugin Customization

ChatGPT offers users an impressive array of plugins, providing limitless possibilities for customization. With a vast selection of plugins available, users can create unique combinations to suit their specific needs. In this regard, ChatGPT receives high marks. Open Playground, on the other hand, also supports plugins, offering users a diverse range of options. However, it's important to note that Open Playground's plugin ecosystem may not be as extensive or varied as that of ChatGPT.


In conclusion, for the average user, ChatGPT still holds an edge over Open Playground. However, personal preferences and usage vary, and both platforms have their merits. As an author, I find myself using both platforms. Open Playground is my go-to for copywriting, alongside the occasional use of Julie's Writer. On the other hand, ChatGPT serves me well for prompt testing, leveraging its diverse range of plugins. Ultimately, the decision between Open Playground and ChatGPT depends on individual requirements and preferences.

I hope you found this comparative analysis helpful. If you did, please consider sharing it with others who might benefit from it. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and stay tuned for more articles in the future.

Previous Post

A Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4 Open Playground, Bart, and Bing

Next Post

Where's the Scale? Exploring AI, News, and YouTube Videos

About The auther

New Posts

Popular Post